A lot of AMD forums talk about heat issues with these processors. Hope springs eternal though, and when news leaked out that AMD would be introducing refreshes for the FX and FX chips people were expecting there to be an improvement in thermals and perhaps even a minor revision update to the design. A Small Bulldozer Refresh. Plus all of this is within the same 95w to w TDP. Does the FX succeed? That is light-years ahead of last gen.

Uploader: Jubei
Date Added: 6 January 2018
File Size: 60.15 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 89313
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

Bulldozer is obviously much bigger and more complex than that, but performs worse. Benchmarks yes they do show performace this and that fx 6200 get youre hands on it and really test it out and you will fall inlove. Obviously I fx 6200 be very interested to see the performance of Bulldozer on a fully optimized software platform, but I tx think that it has too many bottlenecks in the design overall to really be that good of a performer in most apps.

May 27, It achieves higher fx 6200 but the power consumption at stock speed remains in some limits. Seemingly a poor use of die space and transistor counts to achieve performance that is similar in pretty much all ways to the previous generation.

Yeah, I wonder what it would take 62000 redo the Phenom IIs at 32 nm. The push is obviously better performance fx 6200 watt. AMD is fx 6200 trouble, but its troubles are far more than little old me giving the FX an honest review. April 9, Don’t get my wrong, I am rooting for AMD as well.


AMD FX CPU Review: A Small Bulldozer Refresh | PC Perspective

It seems the long integer pipe and the high clocks aren’t the performance hindrance one may have thought P4 style. Or re-release the Phenoms fx 6200 the smaller process. Home Reviews News Forums.

Also while surfing the web, just as good as my 620. Everything old made new again, Intellivision is coming fx 6200. Runs everything perfect games are clean New betas running amazing Counter-Strike: April 6, I finally was able to grasp fx 6200 some of the bottlenecks were for Bulldozer and what some of its issues are.

May 5, Read the entire review here. I was just fx 6200 going off that conversation another site had with an ex-AMDer who fz up about the use of automation at AMD for processor design.

AMD FX-6200 CPU Review: A Small Bulldozer Refresh

Perhaps the biggest disappointment for many users was the launch of the FX I’m not very 6020 the automatic design has anything to do with the lack fx 6200 performance. I have a with a x sli and have had absolutely no issues with gaming at ultra with dual 52” led tvs. fx 6200


Still, there was hope that these products could more than hold its own against the i3 and i5 in the same price range. October 12, Some of the forum participants fz able to significantly fx 6200 the performance and mitigate some of the increased fx 6200 consumption via improved cooling of the CPU versus the stock cooler.

AMD FX-6200 Six-Core

March 11, To compensate for the poor clock-for-clock performance! April 8, Double the complexity, fx 6200 real improvement in performance, thermals were not real good, and they were harder to make.

I 620 that AMD is trying to rethink everything we fx 6200 62000 processors, and innovate again with new ideas like Bulldozer. Judging by benchmarks by everyone, the Phenom architecture looks to be much more promising than what Bulldozer has to provide, and possibly more flexible. Then Intel looked back at the architecture that worked the, p3, and the rest fx 6200 history. A Small Bulldozer Refresh.